Shorting a stock, 2.0 style

Warning: this content is older than 365 days. It may be out of date and no longer relevant.

Early this morning, someone filed a CNN iReport (citizen generated content) saying that Apple (ticker: AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs had a massive heart attack.

Apple’s stock immediately dropped 5%.

AAPL: 104.52 +4.42 (4.42%) - Apple Inc.

Apple PR responded to mainstream media inquiries denying the rumor, that Jobs was perfectly fine. (hat tip to the Unofficial Apple Weblog for breaking it on Twitter first)

If you were going to short a stock, spreading a false rumor about the CEO’s health would be a great way to cause a panic, long enough to make some serious money. The brilliance of this tactic is that the rumor was done using CNN’s brand. Early “viral” messages said the report came from CNN, not CNN iReport. CNN, in other words, had their brand and credibility hijacked.

What would you do if you were Apple? What should you do?

Apple: get on Twitter. Get in the blogosphere and the new media world. You need to have a point person in the fast moving channels of citizen news to immediately knock down crap like this.

Then have your legal department file a complaint with the SEC and ask for a formal investigation.

Apple shareholders: if you lost money on Apple due to the rumor, is CNN responsible? Is CNN liable? Are they a media outlet or a content distributor. If they fall under common carrier, then who is liable besides the original rumor spreader – and are the shorts, if there were any, profiting with no liability?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Bottom line: if your company is not participating in new media, especially in news channels, you’re going to get run over. Get going.

Did you enjoy this blog post? If so, please subscribe right now!

Shorting a stock, 2.0 style 1 Shorting a stock, 2.0 style 2 Shorting a stock, 2.0 style 3

Get this and other great articles from the source at www.ChristopherSPenn.com

Comments

8 responses to “Shorting a stock, 2.0 style”

  1. Kevin Behringer Avatar

    Christopher:

    Interesting concept and one that companies will have to be careful of…especially if their stock prices rely so heavily on one person.

    One thing that makes me nervous about this is what the push-back will be with regard to citizen journalism. Will CNN just stop iReport all together? I agree that Apple needed to come out on Twitter/blogs/etc if they had one. Hey, why not take a lesson from the terrorists for every time the US seems to stop thinking about Osama? Put out a video of him to remind us.

    I worry that this just gives fuel to the fire for those people who say social media and citizen journalism are not good for the industry/world. I think that making CNN liable to the Apple shareholders sets a very dangerous precedent.

    I don't know what the answer is here. How transparent/open can we go before things start becoming detrimental to those who participate?

    I don't know, but I hope this doesn't have the negative effects that I can certainly see it having.

    Kevin

  2. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    The key here really is rapid transparency. If Apple had good listening posts in place, they could have quickly slapped up a video on Apple.com from Steve saying, “Um, no, I'm fine, guys.”

  3. Kevin Behringer Avatar

    Christopher:

    Interesting concept and one that companies will have to be careful of…especially if their stock prices rely so heavily on one person.

    One thing that makes me nervous about this is what the push-back will be with regard to citizen journalism. Will CNN just stop iReport all together? I agree that Apple needed to come out on Twitter/blogs/etc if they had one. Hey, why not take a lesson from the terrorists for every time the US seems to stop thinking about Osama? Put out a video of him to remind us.

    I worry that this just gives fuel to the fire for those people who say social media and citizen journalism are not good for the industry/world. I think that making CNN liable to the Apple shareholders sets a very dangerous precedent.

    I don't know what the answer is here. How transparent/open can we go before things start becoming detrimental to those who participate?

    I don't know, but I hope this doesn't have the negative effects that I can certainly see it having.

    Kevin

  4. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    The key here really is rapid transparency. If Apple had good listening posts in place, they could have quickly slapped up a video on Apple.com from Steve saying, “Um, no, I'm fine, guys.”

  5. Rika's Juicing Recipes Avatar

    This is interesting. Glad I am not a public figure – having to worry about rumors day in and day out must be a bore. These days rumors can spread so fast. They simply can’t be controlled. It is scary to think what it can do to stock prices. Have to be wide awake and able to respond super fast.

  6. Ken Avatar

    The stock chart of AAPL showing the heart attach is amazing, I need to scan for this type of news story more often, even thought I don't wish bad health on anyone

  7. Ken Avatar

    The stock chart of AAPL showing the heart attach is amazing, I need to scan for this type of news story more often, even thought I don’t wish bad health on anyone

  8. Ken Avatar

    The stock chart of AAPL showing the heart attach is amazing, I need to scan for this type of news story more often, even thought I don't wish bad health on anyone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This