Why you must bet the farm on mobile and social media

Warning: this content is older than 365 days. It may be out of date and no longer relevant.

Why you must bet the farm on mobile and social media

Financial Aid Podcast 2007 Year in ReviewMitch Joel‘s keynote at MarketingProfs (which is a neat evolution of a talk I saw him give at PodCamp Toronto years ago) sparked an idea in my head about how we’re communicating with customers and what it means for your business. In his talk, he mentions the internal conversation, the one to one conversation, and the one to many conversation – how marketers can interact with their audiences.

Let’s take this a step further. Before we do, let’s look at a few changes in computing and communications.

The 1990s were the decade of email and email marketing. Computers were leashed to the wall for nearly every task. Even my ultra-awesome at the time Powerbook 1400cs (cs stood for color screen, imagine that!) needed to be tied to the wall for any form of communications. Most people were still computing using machines the size of aircraft carriers, and while the Web had just gotten popular amongst the high-tech crowd, by no means was it mainstream. Email was it, partly because email was something that people could grasp onto and understand immediately – form of electronic communications that worked very much like the real world’s analog equivalents. There were letters, addresses, inboxes, etc. – a good entry point for many.

2000-2009 was the decade of the Web, unquestionably. Computers got smaller and much, much cheaper. The decade started out with the Pentium III line of processors barely topping 1 GHz, and ended with computers shipping with four-core CPUs. People figured out the Web, they figured out what was possible beyond making a brochure of their company. YouTube, MySpace, Facebook, and Twitter arrived. Wireless Internet access via Wi-Fi finally got hot and achieved some level of market penetration.

Here we are in 2010. Computers are shipping now with as much processing power in a handheld as in a desktop, and Wi-Fi + 3G are the standard rather than the exception. The latest computer is fully mobile – the iPad – needing only to stop to recharge its internal battery and not much else. All this and we’re barely into the mobile revolution. This corresponds with the latest change of mind – social media.

While social media got its start in the era of the Web, it’s rapidly evolving to take advantage of the devices now afforded to it in ways the regular web simply cannot. There’s nothing more social than hanging out with friends and passing a mobile device for someone to have a quick laugh at a text, a mobile pic, or a Tweet. There’s nothing more social than sitting with colleagues and just handing someone an iPad to say, “look at this…”

As devices get smaller and easier to use, they become more social. Clay Shirky said it best – when something becomes technologically boring, it becomes socially interesting. In the case of the iPhone and iPad, the interface becomes so intuitive so quickly that it fades away to nothingness, leaving only you and what you aim to accomplish.

So let’s tie all this together. Email was and is, for functional purposes, the one to one conversation. Yes, you can broadcast email, yes you can reply to all in a manner that’s as convenient as it is painful, but fundamentally email is a one to one conversation.

The Web was the one to many conversation. Put up your site and as long as your server can handle the traffic, you can do one to many conversations better than at any point in human history. You can get noticed, become popular, and do business at greater velocity than ever before.

Social – and the mobile devices that will increasingly power it – is the next logical extension of Mitch’s framework. Social is the many to many conversation, where you as a marketer are an active participant, but you’re not in control, not in charge, not even directing the conversation. You are among your peers, interacting, collaborating, and creating.

Just as the rules for email are different than the rules for the Web, so are the rules for social different than what preceded it. Chris Brogan and Greg Cangialosi often like to quip that the strategy of choice is “be there before the sale” but that’s not enough. You have to be relevant before the sale. You have to be credible before the sale. You have to earn a seat at the table not only before but at the time the decision is being made, which means you have to have persistent presence of mind in the business cycle of your prospective customers.

In this framework, that also means that everything you do has to have at least an idea of how it will appear in a mobile computing landscape. If all you do is broadcast useless updates on Facebook and Twitter, you won’t be shared or talked about. You’ll stop appearing in people’s streams – and when the majority of communication is done on smaller form factor mobile devices, what little slice of screen real estate attention you have left will vanish.

If someone were to pass around your web site on a mobile device at an executive roundtable, what would they see?

  • How easy is it to find a call to action?
  • How easy is it to find a call to share?
  • How easy is it to pass around by word of mouth?

The future based on trend growth is clear: mobile devices will power the way your prospective customers communicate, and social media will be the many to many conversation medium in which you will do business. Bear in mind, there will still be one to one and one to many – but there will also be many to many, and you need to be there.

Are you ready?


Did you enjoy this blog post? If so, please subscribe right now!

Why you must bet the farm on mobile and social media 1 Why you must bet the farm on mobile and social media 2 Why you must bet the farm on mobile and social media 3

Get this and other great articles from the source at www.ChristopherSPenn.com! Want to take your conference or event to the next level? Book me to speak and get the same quality information on stage as you do on this blog.

Comments

26 responses to “Why you must bet the farm on mobile and social media”

  1. Batman Avatar
    Batman

    Betting the farm would be easier to do, if I had a farm to bet with. And it seems like you're stating I should hedge my bets, by splitting between mobile and social media. However, I don't see it as an either/or proposition….

  2. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    Mobile and social aren't either/or. They're intricately bound together and will be even more so going forward.

  3. Batman Avatar
    Batman

    Ok, I'll bite. Why? I don't need to use social media while I'm mobile. It's a luxury, at least, for me. I don't see them being intricately bound together, as you state. I need a more compelling argument, and I perform all my social media functions from my desktop.

  4. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    You don't, but a whole crapload of other people do.

  5. Batman Avatar
    Batman

    So, to review, this argument has already degenerated to, “Does not!! Does too!!!” Great. Your contention is that other people NEED to use both social media and mobile? Sounds like an addiction to me. Maybe they want to use both together, however, it's not a necessary thing.

  6. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    I think it's more like Bud Light's Less Filling/Tastes Great argument than does not/does too. Do end users need to use both social and mobile? No. Not at all. Consumers can and will do whatever they want. Some want just social on the desktop – and there will always be a place for it, just as there remains a place for theater (despite claims that radio and television would kill it). There will always be email marketing as long as we have email. Gutenberg's printing press remains relevant hundreds of years later.

    Do marketers who want the broadest adoption of their content? I'd argue yes. Offering as many different ways as practical to get at your stuff is good sense unless there's a compelling business reason not to.

  7. Batman Avatar
    Batman

    Ok, we're agreed on that. Thanks for taking the time for this conversation.

  8. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    Always happy to have intelligent conversation.

  9. whitneyhoffman Avatar
    whitneyhoffman

    I agree- the future is mobile and social.

    What still fascinates me is the promise of Jeff Han's multitouch surface which depends on HUGE- depends on being able to touch and interact with data, sort, slice, dice, drill down, collapse and identify unique patterns and solutions, but size and interaction with others in the process is important. So to be honest, while a large portion of things will be all mobile all the time, there will be times people will have to come together in person- and the large, multi-user, complex information-made-simple-through-graphical-interfaces will be in every conference room everywhere.
    We need access to data and information everywhere, but parsing the data still sometimes is best done in groups and together- the social part of information sharing.

  10. Batman Avatar
    Batman

    Betting the farm would be easier to do, if I had a farm to bet with. And it seems like you're stating I should hedge my bets, by splitting between mobile and social media. However, I don't see it as an either/or proposition….

  11. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    Mobile and social aren't either/or. They're intricately bound together and will be even more so going forward.

  12. Batman Avatar
    Batman

    Ok, I'll bite. Why? I don't need to use social media while I'm mobile. It's a luxury, at least, for me. I don't see them being intricately bound together, as you state. I need a more compelling argument, and I perform all my social media functions from my desktop.

  13. Stefan Holt Avatar

    Words of wisdom from the “Marketing Ninja” …social + mobile = socially mobile… and that means word of mouth taken to the extreme WOMxWOM

    It’s not just having your seat at the table, it’s creating a new table for people to sit. Keep batting away the ideas, I’m sure some in the outfield will catch a few fly balls.

    Mobile continues to grow exponentially. Younger and younger demos are not only accepting and adopting it is the norm. To not have one is the exception. Ask a college, high school, and I will even say a middle school student if they have a mobile device…and the answer of yes may be as high as 85-90% And who “isn’t” social during those years? Plus they’re one of the fastest user groups to create content. Content + Reach + Time = Exposure
    imho, that’s the formula for all mass media.

  14. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    You don't, but a whole crapload of other people do.

  15. Batman Avatar

    So, to review, this argument has already degenerated to, “Does not!! Does too!!!” Great. Your contention is that other people NEED to use both social media and mobile? Sounds like an addiction to me. Maybe they want to use both together, however, it’s not a necessary thing.

  16. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    I think it’s more like Bud Light’s Less Filling/Tastes Great argument than does not/does too. Do end users need to use both social and mobile? No. Not at all. Consumers can and will do whatever they want. Some want just social on the desktop – and there will always be a place for it, just as there remains a place for theater (despite claims that radio and television would kill it). There will always be email marketing as long as we have email. Gutenberg’s printing press remains relevant hundreds of years later.

    Do marketers who want the broadest adoption of their content? I’d argue yes. Offering as many different ways as practical to get at your stuff is good sense unless there’s a compelling business reason not to.

  17. David Pye Avatar

    Great article, Chris.

    “Persistent presence of mind in the business cycle”, indeed.

  18. Batman Avatar

    Ok, we’re agreed on that. Thanks for taking the time for this conversation.

  19. Christopher S. Penn Avatar

    Always happy to have intelligent conversation.

  20. whitneyhoffman Avatar

    I agree- the future is mobile and social.

    What still fascinates me is the promise of Jeff Han’s multitouch surface which depends on HUGE- depends on being able to touch and interact with data, sort, slice, dice, drill down, collapse and identify unique patterns and solutions, but size and interaction with others in the process is important. So to be honest, while a large portion of things will be all mobile all the time, there will be times people will have to come together in person- and the large, multi-user, complex information-made-simple-through-graphical-interfaces will be in every conference room everywhere.
    We need access to data and information everywhere, but parsing the data still sometimes is best done in groups and together- the social part of information sharing.

  21. […] stages, and instead get on to the doing and shipping stages of a project.  You have to figure out when it’s a good time to bet the farm, and when it’s a good time to diversify your holdings, so to speak.  I’ll always be […]

  22. Jack Avatar

    This is really a great article Chris.I liked the way you have described the things.
    Fantastic and keep it up…!!!

  23. Jack Avatar

    This is really a great article, Chris. Social Media should be available and accessible to everyone.

  24. Derek Avatar

    I know that I'm guilty of ignoring mobile because I don't use a smartphone, but you make some excellent points about why we should be paying very close attention to mobile marketing. Thanks for the reminder!

  25. Derek Avatar

    I know that I'm guilty of ignoring mobile because I don't use a smartphone, but you make some excellent points about why we should be paying very close attention to mobile marketing. Thanks for the reminder!

  26. Derek Avatar

    I know that I'm guilty of ignoring mobile because I don't use a smartphone, but you make some excellent points about why we should be paying very close attention to mobile marketing. Thanks for the reminder!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This